brightlywoven: Pickwick the dodo, one of a kind, hand made by my stepmum (camera)
brightlywoven ([personal profile] brightlywoven) wrote2008-06-13 11:54 am
Entry tags:

boring!

I have found a task that I loathe even more than data entry.
Data clean up.

I made a brief foray into stata, but found that my database was full of little holes, and if I didn't clean it up i'd be getting junk. Now, as I sift through thousands of pages in no particular order, I wish I'd been more organised.

And in the more rigorous world of clinical trial cleaning, we have reached new lows of pedantry. Today I received a query, asking me to reconcile two entries that did not 'exactly match'.
Listed under medical history (the patient's condition) "Reversal of ileostomy August 2007, with post-operative pain"
Listed under medication indication (the reason a medication was given) "Post operative pain following reversal of ileostomy".

Surely it is obvious to the most lay of lay persons that these are THE EXACT SAME THING!
Ironically, the only way to satisfy this pedant monster would be to say that the paracetamol was given for "Reversal of ileostomy August 2007, with post-operative pain", as though the operation was something we needed to 'treat'. Dammit.
shehasathree: (Default)

[personal profile] shehasathree 2008-06-13 11:29 am (UTC)(link)
:o
they each use the same words, and everything!

[identity profile] dr-biscuit.livejournal.com 2008-06-13 11:32 am (UTC)(link)
It doesn't seem terribly difficult does it?
How about this one: Indication (type two diabetes) doesn't match medical history term (type 2 diabetes).
That's because the indication field won't accept numerals, and Type 2 Diabetes is the correct term, wench!
shehasathree: (Default)

[personal profile] shehasathree 2008-06-13 11:38 am (UTC)(link)
i need a *headdesk* icon to be able to respond appropriately to this comment.

[identity profile] dr-biscuit.livejournal.com 2008-06-13 11:49 am (UTC)(link)
uh huh, I just don't have anything sufficiently despairing!