brightlywoven (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
brightlywoven) wrote2008-08-23 10:07 pm
brightlywoven) wrote2008-08-23 10:07 pm
Entry tags:
Medals of shame
So in the last week I've lost count of the number of times someone has asked me to express chagrin that 'Team GB' (seriously?) has won more gold medals than Australia at the Olympics. Seriously. As though I ought to start gnashing my teeth in despair at this fact.
I've always been rather ashamed at the fact that, per head of population, Australia features quite highly in these tables, because, frankly, it suggests we spend far too much money to enable people to take part in elite competitions. It doesn't reflect the sporting prowess (or participation) of the average Australian, but does highlight a rather nasty aspect of our culture - that we care deeply about being the winner in zero sum games. To see the Brits now aspiring to that is depressing.
To have radio 4 natter on about how they have more medals than Australia for more than 10 minutes every morning is a bore, and undermines the high ground Britain had previously held (in being able to claim to have more important things to care about).
Next time the Daily Mail rails at NICE for 'trying to put a price on human life', http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1042447/MAIL-COMMENT-How-NHS-price-life.html
maybe they could ask how many cancer drugs could be funded with the £12 billion budget for 2012. And instead of bemoaning the use of public money to treat 'obesity and IVF',
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7561724.stm
maybe Terry Pratchett could hassle the cycling team to fund his Aricept.
I've always been rather ashamed at the fact that, per head of population, Australia features quite highly in these tables, because, frankly, it suggests we spend far too much money to enable people to take part in elite competitions. It doesn't reflect the sporting prowess (or participation) of the average Australian, but does highlight a rather nasty aspect of our culture - that we care deeply about being the winner in zero sum games. To see the Brits now aspiring to that is depressing.
To have radio 4 natter on about how they have more medals than Australia for more than 10 minutes every morning is a bore, and undermines the high ground Britain had previously held (in being able to claim to have more important things to care about).
Next time the Daily Mail rails at NICE for 'trying to put a price on human life', http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1042447/MAIL-COMMENT-How-NHS-price-life.html
maybe they could ask how many cancer drugs could be funded with the £12 billion budget for 2012. And instead of bemoaning the use of public money to treat 'obesity and IVF',
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7561724.stm
maybe Terry Pratchett could hassle the cycling team to fund his Aricept.